General NewsLocal News

Parliament accepts revised 2022 Budget

Listen to this Article Now
Spread the love

Parliament on Tuesday acknowledged the adjustment of the 2022 Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the government.

The acknowledgment by the House followed the laying of the overhauled spending plan proclamation that contained key concessions that address the key worries communicated by people in general, the Minority in Parliament and bosses over the 2022 financial plan.

The archive likewise explains the public authority’s expectation to forsake the Agyapa Royalties exchange, a portion of GH¢10 million for plausibility and designing examinations for seaside networks, including Keta and its environs that were as of late impacted by tsunamis, just as joining remedial explanations identifying with Aker Energy, in addition to other things.

The report, which was laid by a Clerk of Parliament, was introduced to the Office of the Speaker of Parliament by the Minister of Finance, Mr Ken Ofori-Atta, last Monday.

Laying to be expected

Before long it was laid, the First Deputy Speaker, Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu, who directed procedures, caused the House to notice the way that the Minister of Finance, while moving the movement on the spending plan on November 17, 2021, had requested that the House support it subject to adjustment.

“Regardless of whether you call them concession for sure, he is proposing change and that is the thing that is being laid to the House.

So it is nothing that is astonishing for us,” he said.

He coordinated the changed approach explanation, as postponed in the House, to be added to the first spending plan strategy articulation to permit the different boards to think about them during conversations on spending plan gauges.

Minority protest

However, the Minority communicated solid reservation over the way in which the amended spending plan report was laid in the House, contending that the laying didn’t follow the legitimate parliamentary technique.

The Minority Leader, Mr Haruna Iddrisu, said while the Speaker imparted to the Clerk to lay the report, per the House’s training and strategies, the Finance Minister or a priest of state or any of his representatives ought to have rather laid the archive.

Appropriate laying done

Recognizing the presence of Deputy clergymen of Finance in the Chamber, the Deputy Majority Leader, Mr Alexander Afenyo-Markin, said since the spending plan report was addressed to the Speaker, it was proper for the Speaker to have the Clerk lay it.

He said he was glad that the Minister of Finance had tended to every one of the worries raised by the Minority on tsunamis and the Keta Sea protection project.

“The clergyman has even guaranteed us that he will proceed with counsels and commitment.

We are of the view that the entire embodiment of vote based system isn’t to close the entryway yet to open it for constant commitment,” he said.

E-demand is reformatory

Remarking on the record later, Mr Iddrisu said his side actually stood went against to the presentation of the 1.75 percent electronic exchange (E-demand) by the public authority at all levels of the economy.

He said the E-demand was reformatory, as it would cause “difficulty on the center poor” of Ghanaians and would sabotage Ghana’s mission to grow an advanced economy.

Mr Speaker, we are directed by the public great and we believe that cash recoverable from the Auditor-General’s report can also make up for the burden of the E-demand.

“So Mr Speaker, we on this side can’t uphold the public authority in its journey to force an E demand at 1.75 percent on MoMo and related exchanges, including settlements and banks’ exchanges,” he said.

While conceding that there had been common commitment on vexed issues in the spending plan, Mr Iddrisu said lamentably the gatherings couldn’t have “an arrangement and agreement, as caught by the priest’s own assertion, on the vexed matter of the E-demand”.

Terrible point of reference

The NDC MP for Bawku Central, Mr Mahama Ayariga, said the Finance Minister moved a movement for the House to cast a ballot, embracing or dismissing the 2022 Budget articulation.

“So assuming the Finance Minister is to change the arrangement proclamation or financial plan, he should drop by another movement; he can’t simply lay a paper here and that paper will change what we have as of now decided on,” he said.

He conceded that while the House would acknowledge the laid record, the appropriate system should be continued all together for the House not to start a terrible trend.